The Trident: Income and Estimates 2010 - The Trident

Jump to content

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Income and Estimates 2010

#1 User is offline   Solidus 

  • Director General
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 20,981
  • Joined: 26-July 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 March 2010 - 05:27 AM

Quote

GOVERNMENT IS HOPING to raise $2.45 billion in revenue in the 2010 financial year, while its expenses are expected to hit the $3.8 billion mark.

This was revealed in the 2010 to 2011 Estimates Of Revenue And Expenditure laid in the House of Assembly yesterday by Prime Minister and Minister of Finance David Thompson.

The situation leaves the Thompson administration with a $593 million deficit to plug.


The overall fiscal balance, as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) minus amortisation, is projected at 7.4 per cent down from 8.2 per cent last year. This is under the International Financial Institutions standard.

Moreover, in this fiscal year Government will face $1.21 billion in debt servicing. Of that figure, $722 million will go towards debt amortisation which is up from $460.17 million estimated for this last year.

The Estimates show that Government is planning to raise at least $200 million in foreign borrowing, as it has listed $200 million in non-project foreign financing.

As usual, Barbados will dedicate the largest portion of its budget to educating its citizens, with $519.82 million going to the Ministry of Education and Human Resource Development. Next is the Ministry of Health with a total budget of $335.77 million and the Ministry of Environment, Water Resources and Drainage which has $139.2 million budgeted for its operations.

Asked for initial comment on Government's projections, University of the West Indies economics lecturer and former Central Bank economist Dr Winston Moore said that Government's provision of $181 million for capital expenditure on fixed assets, which was more than double the amount spent for this area last year, suggested that the administration was likely to do more in fixed financing and this "bode well for future growth".

"Government is pulling back but also looking at both current and future growth. The fiscal deficit is coming down but the drawback is that financing is not adequately accounted for."

In this connection, Moore pointed to the $466 million listed under Domestic Financing in the summary of Government operations and financing.

According to Moore, "this is nearly $500 million to finance the deficit and I suspect it may come through some additional treasury bills or treasury notes even though it has only budgeted $25 million for treasuring bills in 2010".

"I guess Government is looking at a strategic rate depending on which comes in lowest. But [$466 million] is a lot left open to finance the deficit," the economist noted.
Nation



Starting next week people. Tune in
0

#2 User is offline   Sledgehammer 

  • Vice President
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,019
  • Joined: 04-September 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 March 2010 - 01:18 PM

Whatever happened to the talk of reducing the deficit immediately?
0

#3 User is offline   nineball 

  • Assistant Vice President
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,238
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 10 March 2010 - 04:33 PM

Ya coudl reduce de deficit by increasing revenue, wha wrong wid you.
0

#4 User is online   Zero 

  • Manager
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 524
  • Joined: 22-November 09

Posted 10 March 2010 - 08:58 PM

View Postnineball, on Mar 10 2010, 04:33 PM, said:

Ya coudl reduce de deficit by increasing revenue, wha wrong wid you.



LOL not to mention that operating budgets were SLASHED left and right in the MAJORITY of Ministries. They will be running ONLY the necessary programmes.
0

#5 User is offline   Solidus 

  • Director General
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 20,981
  • Joined: 26-July 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:15 PM

Well from what I seeing, the deficit is going to be over hald a billion dollars, so if that is through the cutting of expenses God help us all.

I hear that temp workers already getting de cut.
0

#6 User is online   Kratos 

  • Vice President
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 4,468
  • Joined: 26-July 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St.Philip

Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:29 PM

View PostSolidus, on Mar 10 2010, 09:15 PM, said:

Well from what I seeing, the deficit is going to be over hald a billion dollars, so if that is through the cutting of expenses God help us all.

I hear that temp workers already getting de cut.

Where did u hear this?
Maybe in places considered to be offering non-essential services..
0

#7 User is online   Zero 

  • Manager
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 524
  • Joined: 22-November 09

Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:39 PM

View Post@RTFUL D0DG3R, on Mar 10 2010, 09:29 PM, said:

View PostSolidus, on Mar 10 2010, 09:15 PM, said:

Well from what I seeing, the deficit is going to be over hald a billion dollars, so if that is through the cutting of expenses God help us all.

I hear that temp workers already getting de cut.

Where did u hear this?
Maybe in places considered to be offering non-essential services..



I was wondering as well.
0

#8 User is offline   Solidus 

  • Director General
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 20,981
  • Joined: 26-July 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 March 2010 - 09:52 PM

From a chap who was unlucky

(I assume wunna talking about the cuts and not the $600M hole)
0

#9 User is online   Zero 

  • Manager
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 524
  • Joined: 22-November 09

Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:35 PM

Yeh Sol the cuts.


What was he doing? He was a Clerical Officer?
0

#10 User is offline   nineball 

  • Assistant Vice President
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,238
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:37 PM

Realise ya aint hear nutten more bout this wage freeze/moratorium
So either David gine pull a big foot move and just pass it.
Or he already discuss it wid de unions and dem agree and aint saying a word.
Also look for an increase in taxes, if not de same VAT, or at least on certain items.
Cause if ya really think about it, there are only a few ways to increase revenune that government pulls in.
0

#11 User is online   Zero 

  • Manager
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 524
  • Joined: 22-November 09

Posted 10 March 2010 - 10:57 PM

Agreed Nineball.
0

#12 User is offline   Solidus 

  • Director General
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 20,981
  • Joined: 26-July 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 March 2010 - 05:19 AM

View PostZero, on Mar 10 2010, 10:35 PM, said:

Yeh Sol the cuts.


What was he doing? He was a Clerical Officer?




No clue
0

#13 User is offline   Solidus 

  • Director General
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 20,981
  • Joined: 26-July 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 March 2010 - 05:49 AM

http://assets.mediaspanonline.com/prod/4203848/thurstoon-mar11_w400.jpg


While the loss of jobs is indeed tragic, I fear that the $600M deficit is a bigger problem with longer lasting ramifications if not tackled correctly.
0

#14 User is online   Kratos 

  • Vice President
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 4,468
  • Joined: 26-July 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St.Philip

Posted 11 March 2010 - 06:19 AM

I suspect vat will go to 17.5%
0

#15 User is offline   Solidus 

  • Director General
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 20,981
  • Joined: 26-July 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 March 2010 - 06:42 AM

THAT is a large jump.
0

#16 User is offline   nineball 

  • Assistant Vice President
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,238
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 11 March 2010 - 06:52 AM

Lets get the bets rolling.

Psychologically speaking, no one wants something with a .5% on a tax.
Its like why in retail, things are priced at $X.99, or $X.95 instead of $X.00, or $X.05, its better PR.

So I would think, that if he was going to raise VAT, he would raise it by 1% or 2% and tout the benefiits as a small negligible increase on each individual, but on an overall basis at all collections points, will raise the government Xmillions in additional revenues, and there by help everyone contribute to the efforst of TEAM Barbados.

Or, raise it to 17% on luxury items such as cars, cell phones, cigarettes, alcohol.

Im gonna go with 16%
0

#17 User is online   Kratos 

  • Vice President
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 4,468
  • Joined: 26-July 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St.Philip

Posted 11 March 2010 - 07:14 AM

I wonder if computers will remain zero rated... Books are attracting a 3% environmental levy already.
I found out the reason why they are holding computers in customs.. apparently to get the duty free status an entry has to be logged.. automatic $15 for govt.
0

#18 User is offline   nineball 

  • Assistant Vice President
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,238
  • Joined: 04-August 08

Posted 11 March 2010 - 07:22 AM

Friend of mine brought in some books recently, had the 3% environmental levy, $10 Ascuyda processing fee, and someother fee that brought it up to $75 on 4 books.
Madness.
0

#19 User is offline   Polaris 

  • Vice President
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,107
  • Joined: 28-July 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 March 2010 - 07:35 AM

View Postnineball, on Mar 11 2010, 09:22 AM, said:

Friend of mine brought in some books recently, had the 3% environmental levy, $10 Ascuyda processing fee, and someother fee that brought it up to $75 on 4 books.
Madness.


SERIOUSLY?
$10 Ascuyda fee for a data entry?
Did I miss something?
0

#20 User is online   Mama Dlo 

  • Assistant Vice President
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,028
  • Joined: 12-September 08
  • Gender:Female

Posted 11 March 2010 - 07:39 AM

View Postnineball, on Mar 11 2010, 07:22 AM, said:

Friend of mine brought in some books recently, had the 3% environmental levy, $10 Ascuyda processing fee, and someother fee that brought it up to $75 on 4 books.
Madness.


Was this through the post office. We have not brought in books for a couple of months and I didn't even know about the 3% levy
0

Share this topic:


  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users